Writing About

When creating ficitional movies the purpose is usually to to display ones creativity to the rest of the world. When creationg a fictional movie about someone who maybe already past and lives on in history, the purpose usually to display that persons opinuion of the human being that they are portreying in their film. In the movie Anonymous Shake spear is being viewed as a fraud who only puts on the image that he is actauly the writer instead the film suggest that Shakespear was indeed a fraud. An actor apart of short plays that was hired by a man in power, The duke of London. The duke was ashamed to to show his inter writing skills because it only brought shame and trouble to his family. A Duke was not to be a writer but a leader in justice and jursidiction. The dukes wife became unsatisfied when she found out that her husband was writing again. The duke hired Shakespear. A drunk who was poor and had very little talent in acting, but just enough talent to put on the show that he was indeed the real author of the many scripts performed. The duke would attend the plays and it and watch his work be performed on stage, possing as a by-stander who was just there to be entertained. It has always been a debate to if Shakespear was actually the real author of the work or if only a fraud. this would not be the first script to try and justify their opinion in that arguement. The point of the movie Anonymouse is to display the "truth" of Shakespear. To defend the argument that Shakespear was indeed a fraudulant man who took credit for famouse works throughout a long duration of history. But why do people believe that Shakespear was a fraud. most think it is because he was nor more than a filthy pig displayed no real intrest in his work or even knew a lot about writing to begin with. Others think it is because when confronted with the questions of men and women writers of news articles how was he able to come up with his ideas and display the emotions he did on the stage through his writing, he was not able to give a real striaght forth answer. I stand in the middle. i have never meant William Shakespear and never seen one of his plays performed live. people who do believe that William Shakespear is the real deal find no clear evidence that he is a fraud. Or refuse to believe that he is. Anonymous was a film that included very specific trail and details that would lead up to the belief that Shakespear was a fraud. for example, at the beginning of the movie a man about 21 years of age who was a play directore and writer who owned his own theater is running through town being persued by the patrol, he his being chased for his negative opinions of the king voiced in one of his writings. The man running through the city is one of Shakespears colleagues that he works with on his writing. Once the man was caught he was imprisoned. The duke heard of the man and had him released from jail. the duke paid the man to work with Shakespear and direct the plays that where written. Shakespear was only attended on being the face of the writings while the director was to officiate the entire process. The duke also ensured that the director hire small time actors, not major actors. The Duke had designed a specific layout of his plan to ensure the secret of his writings just so that the world could see his true creativity. But he knew that the world would never know that it was his creativity that was being exposed to the world, and this drove him insane. His wife viewed him as "mad-man." The only people who knew of the dukes skeem was his wife and two other guard’s who were always following him throughout the movie. After watching the movie for about a Half hour had pieced togeather that Shakespear was a fraud, and William Shakespear was not even his real name, the duke was so crazy about writing, so crazy that he spent thousands of pounds (dollars) just so that the world could see his genieouse and in the end and also throughout history no-one would ever know for sure that it was even really his writing. The film had included many other details that were supposed to connect to other details that were supposed to link to "facts" about Shakespear that would expose him as a fake. The entire movie where in sort of a map layout of detailed descriptions ignored throughout history that would prove the truth of William Shakespear to have not being the real author of the writings that went down in history.